From the paper today:
Tea Party attackers need to examine Dems
Radical, Washington ideologues are, by their own policies, shifting politics back to common-sense, free-market wisdoms except for socialistic numbskulls who label all Tea Partiers shotgun rubes draped in festering provincialism. Even Mike Castle’s non-endorsement and envy of Christine O’Connell didn’t turn out to be the left press corps and Democrats serendipitous relief anticipated.Many American’s perceived the aura around the Obamas as the second coming of John and Jackie Kennedy and were suckered by Obama’s pre-inaugural centrist campaign facade. Mob-style, socialistic minions and their grand larceny of free-market prosperity and job growth soon followed with a corrupt agenda.
If U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel ethics violator can pull off a primary with party praise while covered in flaunting corruption, then O’Connell should be Christopher Dodd’s and Barney Frank’s foreclosure poster child. Rangel didn’t win wearing a Black Panthers costume outside a polling station; it was simply malfeasant exemption by a bootlicking constituency.
If you’re a Tea Partier or now disapprove of Obama’s whacky policies, you’re racist, but you can actually violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as a Black Panther and unbelievably have the backing of the Department of Justice and Eric Holder. House Financial Services Rep. Frank commended Obama’s recent SEC protection by incapacitating FOIA, but Democrats were quick to welcome Wiki-leaks liberal Julian Assanges’s leftwing, information release as if they uncovered a couple of unpaid GOP parking tickets.
Besides Washington’s dirty deals, Obama’s cabinet corruptors includes Kathleen Sebelius who didn’t report accurate contribution figures from murdered abortion doctor George Tiller. Ron Kirk owed $10,000 in back taxes. The EPA’s Lisa Jackson was connected in the New Jersey DEP kickback scheme. It goes on and on.
The November countdown nears, and the donkey incumbents are running aimlessly.
Bob Glodowski, West Bend